Dap Scoring Manual
Get this from a library! DAP, Draw a person: a quantitative scoring system. Jack A Naglieri - Uses child's drawings of men, women, and self to assess intelligence and developmental status. Goodenough Scoring or (Draw a person test) presentation definition, administration, scoring and analysis. Speech Therapy Department (Second Year) Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. The DAP:IQ allows you to derive reliable, quantitative ability estimates by using the largest single collection of normative data on this task ever gathered. Download free Ih 1190 Haybine Parts Diagram Manual. To assess the psychometric properties of the Draw a Person: A Quantitative Scoring System (DAP:QSS), in 2543 children (M = 11.43 ± 3.06 years), correlations between drawings scores and Raven’s.
General Information on the Measure | |
---|---|
Purpose of the measure | The DAP assesses young people's strengths, supports, and other noncognitive factors critical for success in life. The DAP can be used to plan positive youth development programs or to identify areas in need of strengthening. |
Main constructs measured | Intrapersonal competencies; Interpersonal competencies |
Applicable grade levels | Ages 8-18 |
Publication year for the most recent version | No information is available in the references reviewed. |
Year originally developed | 2004 |
Related measures | |
Measure Administration | |
Respondent | Student |
Method of administration | Paper/Pencil, Digital |
Number of items | 58 |
Item format | Four-point Likert-type scale |
Administration time | 10 minutes |
Available languages | English, Spanish, and other languages including Albanian, Arabic, Armenian, Chinese, French, Japanese, Nepali, Portuguese, and Tagalog |
Fee for use | Fee charged by developer |
Credentials required for administration | None |
Scoring | |
Overall score reporting | A total DAP score is reported. |
Subscore reporting | Eight subscores are reported:
Scores are also provided by family, school, community, social, and personal contexts. |
Scoring procedures | An online scoring service is provided by the assessment developers. |
Interpretive information | Score reports include narrative information on areas of strength and growth, and they identify asset levels as challenged, vulnerable, adequate, or thriving. |
Evidence of Technical Quality | |
Populations for which technical quality evidence has been collected | Evidence was collected from two samples: 6th-12th grade students in Minnesota (N=13,00), and 6th-8th grade students in Oregon (N=1,110). Additional pilot-testing has occurred with international populations to validate contextualized and translated measures. |
Reliability evidence | Internal consistency estimates averaged 0.81 for the eight asset category scales and 0.88 for the five context scales. Overall DAP score had an internal consistency of 0.97. Test-retest reliability was estimated over a two-week interval, and averaged 0.79 for the eight asset categories. Overall DAP score had a test-retest reliability of 0.87. (Search institute, 2016). Pirates 2005 torrent download. |
Validity evidence |
|
Locating the Measure | |
Obtaining a copy of the measure | search-institute.org |
References | |
Search Institute, 'Developmental assets profile: User manual,' Minneapolis, MN, 2016a. Tennis coaching videos free download. Search Institute, 'User Guide for the Attitudes and Behaviors Survey,' Minneapolis, MN, 2016b. Free download facetime for mac os x 10.6 8. | |
Notes | |
This measure is also reviewed in the AWG Guide. |
See Full List On Aasm.org
Measure summary updated October 3, 2018.